On-page analysis
SEO audit
Paste a URL and get a scored on-page SEO report. NKable fetches the page and grades eight signals — title, meta description, headings, images, links, content quality, technical setup and keyword usage — then lists every issue with a specific fix.
Analyses one public page at a time. Nothing is stored.
About the SEO Audit Tool
This SEO audit tool analyses a page across technical SEO, content quality and performance, returning findings ranked by likely impact. It fetches and inspects the real page rather than producing a generic checklist.
An SEO audit is worth running before deciding what to work on, because the highest-impact problems are rarely the ones that feel most urgent. A missing canonical or an accidental noindex outranks any amount of keyword refinement.
The audit covers the three areas that actually move rankings. Technical: indexability, canonicals, status codes, structured data validity, hreflang. Content: title and description presence and length, heading structure, thin or duplicated copy. Performance: how the page loads, since Core Web Vitals are a confirmed ranking input.
Findings are ranked by likely impact rather than reduced to a single score, because a score encourages optimising the number instead of the site. Treat the output as a prioritised list of things to fix, and re-run it after deploying to confirm the change landed.
How to use the SEO Audit Tool
- Enter the URL. Provide the page you want audited.
- Run the audit. The page is fetched and analysed across all three areas.
- Work down the findings. Start at the top — findings are ordered by likely impact.
- Re-run after deploying. Confirm the fix landed rather than assuming it did.
SEO Audit Tool features
- Indexability, canonical and status code checks
- Structured data validation
- Title, description and heading structure analysis
- Thin and duplicate content detection
- Performance and Core Web Vitals assessment
- Findings ranked by likely impact
Frequently asked questions
What does the audit actually check?
Technical indexability, canonicals, status codes and structured data; content titles, descriptions and headings; and page performance.
Why no single overall score?
A score encourages optimising the number rather than the site. Findings are ranked by likely impact instead.
Which findings should I fix first?
Whatever is at the top. An accidental noindex or a wrong canonical outweighs any amount of keyword work.
Does it check Core Web Vitals?
Yes. Loading performance is assessed, since Core Web Vitals are a confirmed ranking input.
Should I re-run it after fixing something?
Yes. Re-running confirms the change actually deployed rather than assuming it did.